Solutions · Investors · DFIs · Lenders

See operating risk before it becomes portfolio risk.

Gen318 is the post-close operating-evidence layer for investors, DFIs, and lenders financing mini-grid and C&I solar portfolios across Nigeria and Africa. It connects performance, data quality, model accuracy, field response, and compliance—so capital teams can see what changed without waiting for another reconstructed spreadsheet.

Ranked
Site performance

Percentile scores compare each site with the assets inside the portfolio across six operating dimensions.

30-day
Model accuracy

Rolling trends connect predictions to technician-recorded outcomes, feedback volume, retraining, and drift.

Approved
Fleet brief

Every finding cites frozen operating evidence; an approved brief becomes an immutable review record.

01 · Built for capital oversight

One operating record. Different mandates can interrogate it.

Investment and credit teams

Monitor the operating case after close

Compare sites on uptime, energy yield, diesel efficiency, maintenance frequency, and data completeness. See where the operating record is diverging before the next formal review.

Portfolio and asset managers

Turn exceptions into operator follow-up

Move from a ranked risk signal to the incident, work order, field finding, and resolution trail instead of asking the operator to reconstruct what happened.

Impact and programme teams

Start reporting from traceable inputs

Keep energy delivered, uptime, diesel use, DARES measures, and evidence coverage tied to their source records for impact, programme, and supervision workflows.

02 · The operating review

Move from a portfolio question to its source record.

Gen318 does not ask a capital team to accept a synthetic score on faith. Each review surface retains the route back to the operating evidence and makes missing data part of the answer.

Which sites are drifting?

Within-portfolio percentile ranks across uptime, diesel efficiency, energy yield, solar performance, maintenance frequency, and completeness.

Can we trust the period?

Signal-level coverage, accepted-quality telemetry, classified gaps, and the weakest required signal made visible before a report is accepted.

Did the operator respond?

Incident history, acknowledgements, work-order status, technician findings, completion evidence, and the current urgent backlog.

Are the models earning trust?

Rolling 30-day accuracy trends grounded in technician-recorded outcomes, with feedback counts, retraining history, and drift status.

What can go into the review pack?

An evidence-grounded fleet brief whose findings cite a frozen operating bundle; once reviewed and approved, the brief is immutable.

03 · Why the record matters

The investment memo is a point in time. Portfolio supervision is continuous.

Primary DFI sources consistently connect capital to ongoing monitoring, impact evidence, and progress against investment commitments. Gen318 supplies the operating record beneath those reviews; it does not replace the financial model, legal data room, or sponsor's environmental and social management system.

IFC portfolio supervision

IFC describes ongoing supervision through client Annual Monitoring Reports and progress against Environmental and Social Action Plans and investment commitments.

Read the primary source

ElectriFI impact monitoring

EDFI MC reports realised impact through recurring portfolio monitoring, using investee data for energy output, access, emissions, and jobs indicators.

Read the primary source

DARES-linked debt

IFC's Darway DARES disclosure describes a revolving facility secured by assignment of DARES receivables, making operating and programme evidence part of the capital story.

Read the primary source
04 · Where Gen318 fits

Not another portal. The evidence layer between operations and oversight.

SparkMeter or Koios can remain the metering and billing source. Odyssey remains the DARES programme platform. Gen318 connects the technical operating record, operator response, and reporting evidence that capital providers need to review.

01

Site and operator record

Telemetry · alerts · work orders · field findings · compliance artefacts

02

Gen318 evidence layer

Quality gates · baselines · percentile ranks · accuracy · reviewed briefs

03

Capital review

Portfolio management · investment committee · lender · impact programme

05 · The evidence

Numbers you can check.

6 dimensions

Each site is percentile-ranked within its portfolio on uptime, diesel efficiency, energy yield, solar performance, maintenance frequency, and data completeness.

Fleet benchmark engine
30 days

Model-accuracy trends connect predictive-maintenance and demand-forecast outputs to observed outcomes, feedback volume, retraining, and drift.

Learning accuracy dashboard
Frozen

Every generated fleet-brief finding cites an evidence bundle compiled from authoritative fleet, event, work-order, savings, proposal, and compliance records.

Evidence-grounded fleet briefs
Per site

Diesel savings use an approved site baseline and a reporting-period comparison adjusted for material operating-condition changes.

Gen318 M&V approach
Quality-gated

Compliance reporting exposes weak-signal coverage and blocks automatic Odyssey submission below the configured evidence threshold.

DARES compliance workflow

Bring the portfolio review you already run.

We will map the assets, source systems, KPIs, and reporting obligations, then start read-only on a representative set of sites.

Review my evidence stack